Pan Reviews: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method

A pan review is a negative critique of a piece of art, such as a book, movie, or show. It is a scathing takedown that can be cathartic, thrill-inducing, or necessary. While some argue that pan reviews are unnecessary and harmful, others believe they are an important form of art criticism that can bring pleasure to the reader and hold artists accountable. Ultimately, pan reviews are a subjective form of expression that can provide valuable insights or simply entertain.

What is a 'pan' review?

A pan review is a negative critique of a creative work, such as a book, film, TV show, or music. It is a scathing and unapologetically mean takedown of the work, often employing clever and funny writing to demonstrate the reviewer's superiority over the work.

The term "pan review" comes from the idea of panning for gold, where one has to sift through a lot of dirt and rocks to find a few small nuggets of gold. Similarly, in a pan review, the critic sifts through the work to find any redeeming qualities, often concluding that the work is mostly or totally without merit.

Pan reviews can be thrilling and cathartic for readers or viewers who did not enjoy the work being reviewed. They can also be a form of art in themselves, with the reviewer demonstrating their writing skills and wit. However, some people may view pan reviews as unnecessarily harsh or mean-spirited.

While pan reviews may be memorable and even entertaining, they should not be confused with personal attacks on the creators of the work. As music critic Jeff Weiss says, "Nothing is personal in criticism. It's art. You're doing art."

In addition to providing entertainment and artistic value, pan reviews can also serve a critical function by holding artists and creators accountable for the quality of their work. They can be especially impactful when the work being reviewed is seen as a betrayal of the audience's good faith or a moral lapse.

It is worth noting that the effectiveness of a pan review depends on the medium and the target, as well as the reviewer's perspective and intentions. Some pan reviews may be spiteful acts of vengeance, while others may be more principled demands for justice or improvements.

Why do writers pan?

A "pan review" is a totally or mostly negative critique of a book, film, or other work. It is a scathing takedown that can be "cathartic, thrill-inducing, or necessary". But why do writers write them?

Firstly, writers may feel a sense of duty to their readers. They want to help others make better buying decisions and share their experiences to guide others. This is especially true if the writer has had a very positive or very negative experience with a product or service. By writing a pan review, they can help others avoid making the same mistake or, conversely, encourage them to seek out an excellent product or service.

Secondly, writers may want to express their emotions and feel empowered. A review is a public outlet for writers to voice their opinions and let off steam if they've had a bad experience. It can be cathartic to write a negative review, especially if the writer feels personally mistreated or wronged.

Thirdly, pan reviews can be a way for writers to showcase their expertise and improve their standing among their peers. By offering insightful criticism, writers can establish themselves as connoisseurs or experts in their field. This can boost their ego and give them a sense of satisfaction.

Finally, pan reviews can foster a sense of community. By writing and sharing reviews, writers can feel like they are contributing to a common cause and connecting with like-minded people. They can influence others' decisions and potentially make the world a little better in their own way.

Of course, there are potential drawbacks to pan reviews. They can be ethically murky, especially if the reviewer is not being honest or is being paid to write the review. Additionally, they can be time-consuming and expensive, and they may not always have the desired effect on the target audience. However, when done right, pan reviews can be a valuable tool for consumers and businesses alike.

What are the ethics of panning?

The ethics of panning in reviews is a complex and multifaceted topic that involves navigating a fine line between providing constructive criticism and causing unnecessary harm. While negative reviews can be cathartic, thrilling, or even necessary, it is important to consider the potential consequences and ethical implications of such critiques.

One of the main ethical considerations in panning is the potential impact on the creators or subjects of the work being reviewed. While it is important for critics to express their honest opinions, it is also crucial to remember that their words can have real-world consequences. In the age of social media, a scathing review can go viral and potentially damage the reputation or career of the person being criticized. As John Krasinski recounted in an interview with The New York Times, his friend and fellow director, Paul Thomas Anderson, advised him to refrain from publicly disparaging another director's work, stating, "in our business, we've all got to support each other." This perspective highlights the ethical dilemma of whether it is better to offer constructive criticism privately or to voice one's negative opinion publicly.

Another ethical dimension of panning involves the responsibility of the critic to provide fair and unbiased evaluations. Critics should strive for accuracy and avoid letting their personal biases or prejudices influence their reviews. As Jeff Weiss, a music critic, noted, "criticism's art and culture. That's a thousands-of-years-old tradition." This statement underscores the importance of respecting the artistic process and approaching reviews with a sense of professionalism and ethical integrity.

Additionally, critics should be mindful of the potential impact of their words on the public perception of the work being reviewed. A harsh review can influence whether people choose to engage with a particular piece of art, and it can also shape the way people think and feel about it. As such, critics have a responsibility to provide well-reasoned and balanced assessments that go beyond mere personal opinions.

Furthermore, ethical considerations come into play when critics engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. While it is acceptable to critique the work itself, it is generally considered unethical to attack the character or integrity of the creator. This distinction between the work and the creator is crucial for maintaining ethical standards in criticism.

Lastly, the tone and language used in a negative review should also be considered from an ethical perspective. While it can be tempting to use harsh or inflammatory language to emphasize one's displeasure, doing so may cross the line into cruelty or disrespect. Critics should strive for civility and respect, even when expressing strong negative opinions.

In conclusion, the ethics of panning in reviews requires a careful balance between honest criticism, respect for the creators, fairness, and consideration for the potential impact of one's words. Critics have a responsibility to approach their work with integrity and to remember that their opinions can have real consequences for the artists and the public alike.

How has panning changed?

Panning has changed significantly since the 1960s, when the term was first used in relation to music mixing. The process of panning involves placing or moving a sound source within a stereo field, allowing it to be perceived as coming from a specific direction. While the basic concept of panning remains the same, the techniques and technologies used have evolved over time.

In the 1960s, during the transition from mono to stereo, mixing consoles had 3-position pan switches that allowed engineers to pan sounds to the left, centre, or right. This limited the panning options and made it challenging to create a full stereo field. To overcome this, engineers had to duplicate tracks and manually adjust their relative volume levels, a complex and time-consuming task.

Today, modern mixing software and digital audio workstations (DAWs) have replaced physical consoles, offering greater flexibility and precision in panning. With virtual knobs and sliders, engineers can continuously adjust the pan position, not just between left, centre, and right, but also anywhere in between. This allows for more nuanced and creative panning choices, enhancing the overall stereo image of a mix.

Additionally, panning techniques have evolved beyond the traditional left-right spectrum. The LCR (Left-Centre-Right) panning technique, for example, involves panning sounds only to hard left, hard right, or centre positions, avoiding intermediate panning positions. This simplifies the mixing process while still providing a sense of space and directionality.

The use of panning in music production has also become more sophisticated. Beyond simply positioning instruments in the stereo field, panning is now used to create width, depth, and a sense of movement in a mix. By adjusting the pan pot or slider, engineers can make sounds appear to move from one side to the other, adding interest and dynamics to the music.

Furthermore, panning plays a crucial role in sound design and can be used to create stereo effects from mono sounds. Techniques like the Haas effect exploit the psychoacoustic phenomenon of the human hearing system, allowing for the creation of immersive and three-dimensional soundscapes.

In conclusion, while the fundamental concept of panning remains unchanged, the tools and techniques available to engineers and producers have evolved significantly. The advancements in technology and the exploration of creative panning methods have elevated the art of mixing, allowing for more dynamic, immersive, and spatially complex musical experiences.

How do you write a good pan review?

A "pan review" is a totally or mostly negative review of a product or piece of art. To write a good pan review, it's important to remember that reviews reflect back on you as a reviewer, so it's important to be thoughtful and clear in your criticism. Here are some tips for writing a good pan review:

• Provide useful, constructive feedback: A good review includes enough detail to give others a feel for what happened and why you liked or disliked the product or piece of art. Explain which factors contributed to your positive, negative or just so-so experience. You might also offer your view on what the company is doing well, and how they can improve.
• Be detailed, specific, and honest: The more specific you can be, the more likely the review is to be useful. Write from your own individual perspective, keeping it honest and sticking to the facts. Help readers stand in your shoes.
• Talk about a range of elements: Increase the relevance of your review by addressing your overall experience, including the level of customer service you received if applicable. Focusing on only one element, such as product quality or delivery options, provides limited insight to readers.
• Avoid vague words and phrases: Instead of saying "The service was bad," provide specific details like, "The server was friendly but inexperienced and botched our drink order."
• Judge the product for what it is: If you’re reviewing a McDonald’s, don’t complain about how you weren’t waited on hand and foot. Write your review based on reasonable expectations.
• Assume the best: You’re often assessing someone’s execution of their vision or product of their hard work, especially when it comes to art or food. Assume the people who made this thing weren’t out to get you.
• Be civil and friendly: Freedom of speech gives you the right to express yourself, but there’s a line between appropriate and inappropriate. Avoid defamatory statements, which include accusatory statements that are untrue or not yet proven to be true. Instead of pointing an angry finger, adopt a calm, sober tone and explain what took place.
• Include positives if possible: In the most scathing review, you may not include any positives. But if the review is critical, try to find at least one positive to include to provide a break in between your incredible zings.
• Provide your recommendation: A star rating may be the first thing most people see, but folks will also skim your review to see if you’d recommend the product or piece of art to others. You could also include a short explanation, like “I knocked it down one star because my utensils were dirty.”

Frequently asked questions